The article “Nothing but the Truth?: On Lying and
Memoir-Writing” discusses the evolution of ones own thoughts and memories.
Writer Maddie Crumm writes that there is “a fluidity between who we were to
other people, who we thought we were, who we think we were, and who we think we
are now.” What she seems to be communicating here is that there is no universal
truth to the past. People are constantly changing; they mature and through
life’s challenges, experience self-growth.
This made me think about something that a professor once
told me. That is, that when we think about a past memory, we don’t remember
that memory specifically. Instead, we remember how we felt the last time we
thought about that memory. For example, when we undergo an embarrassing event,
we tend to initially find ourselves wanting to hide and trying our hardest to
purge that memory from our minds. However, as we continue thinking about that
moment, it can gradually start becoming funny to us; That one painfully
embarrassing time evolves into that one hilariously embarrassing time.
The article says: “listing facts does not a cohesive story
make — some embellishment, emotional and otherwise, is necessary.” That being
said, I think the concept of fluidity truly aids writers with memoir writing.
We only can only ever experience a moment in our life once, so therefore, how
the writer chooses to convey their “truth” is completely up to them. As long as
they are getting across the emotions that they wish to share, I do not really
see anything wrong with making a few changes to their story as long as most of
it stays real.
But honestly, I haven’t read many memoirs. The one that
first pops into my head is Carrie Fisher’s book The Princess Diarist. Within this book she describes her rise to
fame through her experience filming Star
Wars. She took the diaries that she wrote at the age of nineteen when she
was filming the very first Star Wars movie
and created a memoir. Fisher’s writing contains high amounts of humor and reflective
moments, which is what makes it so entertaining to read.
She writes: “I saw where someone was complaining about
how much celebrities charge for autographs at these events, and in our defense
someone said, ‘Well, you know, it may cost that much now, but when she dies it’s
really going to be worth a lot.’ So my death is worth something to some people.
If I had enough pictures signed someone could put out a hit on me.”
Within this quote, she talks about her experience attending
comic conventions and meeting some of her many fans. I like this quote because it
contains so much information about her thoughts and the life that she lived. By
using the word “worth,” readers can think of it two different ways. Fisher thinks
about how much of an impact she made on her fans and how her life made a
difference to people. However, “worth” could also literally mean monetary value.
Therefore, she criticizes the industry by poking fun at how her life and death
have literally been given a dollar amount.
The Princess Diarist
connects the fluidity mentioned before because Fisher had experienced self-growth
by the time wrote the book; even though the book was based on her diaries from
her youth, she writes from an introspective mindset. That being said, I don’t
think that the response for the memoir would change if it was revealed that events
were exaggerated, but I do think it would if it turned out some of them were
straight up fiction. Her writing goes so deeply into her personal mind that I couldn’t
imagine her making any of it up.
I also think that this memoir would work as a blog since it
was originally a diary to begin with. Therefore, I believe she could have
posted these entries online and gotten the message across. At the same time,
books are also more popular than blogs, so I think that it wouldn’t be as popular
if it were a blog. But, in all honesty, Carrie Fisher was so well known and influential,
readers would probably read her writing on any platform.
Link to buy The Princess Diarist: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-princess-diarist-carrie-fisher/1122492344?ean=9780399173592#/
OR support your local library!
Works Cited:
Crum, Maddie. “Why 'Factually Inaccurate' Memoirs Are More Than Okay.” The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 28 Sept. 2015, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/memoir-writing-facts_us_56044f0be4b08820d91c2132.
Fisher, Carrie. The Princess Diarist. Penguin Publishing Group, 2016.
I love Carrie Fisher, and that is a fantastic take on memoirs; to take feelings written at an entirely different phase of life and include current thoughts and feelings related to those moments. I might pick that one up when I have time over the Summer. I disagree though, about memoirs transferring to the blog medium and still delivering the same message. I feel like the story, as a whole, would lose its cohesion and wind up delivering many smaller messages that become fractured and unrelated.
ReplyDeleteAgh- you automatically get my vote for favorite blog post this week! I am the biggest Star Wars nerd (hence my profile picture and blog name). Carrie Fisher was a phenomenal actress, writer, and advocate for mental health. I completely agree with your statement about Fisher’s memoir transferring fluidly into a blog. Fisher wrote in a comical, yet dramatic style that is attractive to many readers. Considering Fisher was a major advocate for mental health, I believe her blog would be followed by many people with similar struggles. The internet would have been a more efficient way to reach others quickly with her messages. Your writing engages me when you talk about the quote from your professor. I entirely agree that memories are strongly remembered, and more vivid when there is raw emotion behind the events behind remembered. This was an Extremely insightful, and creative post- I really enjoyed this one.
ReplyDelete